MINUTES OF MEETING CENTRE LAKE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Centre Lake Community Development District was held on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. at 8875 N.W. 155th Terrace, Miami Lakes, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Janexy DelRio	Chairman
Justin Trujillo	Vice Chairman
Mario Cubias	Assistant Secretary
Illesy Martino	Assistant Secretary

Also present were:
Jesus Lorenzo	District Manager
Terry Glynn	Governmental Management Services (by phone)
Gabriela Fernandez	District Counsel
Angel Camacho	District Engineer
Maria Hernandez	Miami Management Several Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Mr. Lorenzo called the meeting to order, called roll, and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all who attended the meeting.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Organizational Matters
Consideration of Appointment of Supervisor to Unexpired Term of Office – Seat #1 (11/2028) and Seat #5 (11/2026)
Oath of Office for Newly Appointed Supervisor(s)
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving forward to item No. 2, organizational matters, tab A is consideration of appointment of Supervisor to unexpired term of office, seat #1 which expires in November, 2028, and seat #5 which expires in November, 2026.
Ms. DelRio: So, I have an appointment for seat #1. Mr. Lorenzo: Alright.
Ms. DelRio: And that would be for Illesy Martino.

On MOTION by Ms. DelRio seconded by Mr. Cubias with all in favor, appointing Illesy Martino to fil the unexpired term of office for seat #1 was approved.

Mr. Lorenzo: Welcome to the team Illesy, and before we move forward, as mentioned I’m going to read to you the oath of office, which is standard procedure, so when I say, “I”, you’re going to state your name for the record, and then I’ll read the oath and then you’ll confirm, so “I”.
Ms. Martino: Illesy Martino.
Mr. Lorenzo: A resident of the State of Florida and citizen of the United States of America, being a Supervisor of the Centre Lake Community Development District and recipient of public funds on behalf of the District, do hereby solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Florida, and will faithfully, honestly, and impartially discharge the duties devolving upon me in the office of Supervisor of the Centre Lake Community Development District, Miami-Dade County, Florida.
Ms. Martino: I do.
Mr. Lorenzo: Great, so you’ll fill out the paperwork and we’ll go over the new Board member information.
Ms. DelRio: She can participate in the meeting today, right?
Mr. Lorenzo: Correct, and I’m going to give her an agenda tablet so she can follow
along.

Election of Officer(s)
Mr. Lorenzo: So, now that you guys have appointed Illesy, we can go over the election of officers and the slate. So, according to the slate of officers, we currently have Janexy DelRio as chairman, Justin Trujillo as vice chairman, Mario Cubias as an assistant secretary, and then Illesy Martino, I would assume you could add her as an assistant secretary, unless you guys would like to make any changes.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, so we can add her as an assistant secretary.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, do I have a motion from the Board to keep the slate the same and add Illesy?

Mr. Cubias: I motion.

On MOTION by Mr. Cubias seconded by Ms. DelRio with all in favor, Election of Officers, electing to keep the existing slate of officers the same and add Illesy Martino as an assistant secretary was approved.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience	Comments	(each
speaker has 3 minutes)
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving forward to audience comments, each speak has 3 minutes, and I don’t know if the audience present or online, we have a couple attendees and some residents here with us today. Does anybody have any comments regarding the agenda or regarding anything with regards to the Community Development District? Not hearing any we can move on to the next item.
FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval	of	Minutes	of	the
February 18, 2026 Meeting
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving forward to the approval of the minutes of the February 18, 2026 meeting. Unless there are any comments, deletions or adjustments please let me know, I did just received some from the legal staff on page 5 to remove a few words under Ms. Fernandez, removing the words, “no, there has to be a fee” and then a few other adjustments on pages 7, 8, 30 and page 40. Unless there any other adjustments from the Board, a motion would be in place.

On MOTION by Ms. DelRio seconded by Mr. Trujillo with all in favor, the Minutes of the February 18, 2026 Meeting with the submitted changes were approved.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Resolution #2026-
02 Approving the Proposed Fiscal Year 2027 Budget and Setting the Public Hearing
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving forward to item No. 5 which the consideration of resolution #2026-02 approving the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget and setting the public hearing. So, you guys have the budget on the following pages, and if the Board allows me to go over the budget briefly and we can go page by page and then you guys can chime as

needed. So, resolution #2026-02 is to proposed the fiscal year 2027 budget and for discussion purposes that’s the public maximum assessment level, which is the ceiling just because this is what you guys approve, at the adoption meeting you guys can go back lower, but you cannot go higher, so setting the ceiling now is the priority to establish that because you cannot go more than what you establish at this proposed meeting, unless the Board tables it and then we have another meeting and propose it again. Then we set the public hearing, which is 60 days out from today as you guys know from past experiences, and the budget will be levying assessments on 256 single family homes and 226 townhome units which is 482 total. On pages 1 and 2 you’ll see the general fund, so you’ll see the table contents, then we go to the general fund, you heave the expenditures of the administrative ones, the field expenditures, as well as the clubhouse expenditures. Then we go into the budget narrative which is on pages 3 through 6, you’ll see the budget narrative that goes to each line item and explains what each line item discusses, and what it’s for. Then you have the debt service Series 2026 Special Assessment revenue refunding bonds which is on page 7. Then the amortization schedule that goes with the 2016 bonds which is the infrastructure of the community, and you’ll see the maturity date is December, 2046 and then the totals there, and you guys know that’s a locked fee and so it doesn’t change. Obviously, based on the schedule and when it was approved at the time of the bonds is the fixed rate of the coupons and the interest which you guys will see there. Then moving on to page 9 you’ll see the proposed budget for the debt service Series 2021 Special Assessment revenue refunding bonds, and then moving on to that amortization schedule which goes with the 2021 Series, and as you guys know, or I’m sure you guys already know this but the 2021 bond is the clubhouse purchase, so those are the two separate bonds that you guys have. You’ll see the amortization schedule there on page 10, and the maturity date is May, 2052 and then if you go to the last page of the budget which is page 11 you’ll see the assessment comparison which shows you the amounts per townhome and the amounts per single family, and if you go to that table you’ll see these two components, the operations and maintenance side, and then you have the debt assessment, which is the bonds. So, if you guys go to the first table you will see the admin and field and then the clubhouse is separated, so for 2027 what is being proposed is for the admin and field is $721.59 which in 2026 was $526.32, and then the clubhouse for 2027 what’s being proposed is $1,321.37 versus 2026 which was $963.79, which would be

a total of $1,490.11 for every single family home, and then $1,490.11 for every single townhome, they’re both seen as the same, the increase difference $552.85. Now, on the debt assessment there has been no change, and you guys know that, it’s a fixed fee for each bond, so the Series 2016 is $1,767.76, and the Series 2021 is $1,210.09 which applies to both single family homes and townhomes, and you can see in the 2026 fiscal year budget the amounts are exactly the same. So, a big reason for the increase, and one of the main things was the clubhouse, and going back to 2021 there was no initial increase to my understanding.
Ms. DelRio: And also we took from the sale of the capacity we used it for the operations of the club.
Mr. Lorenzo: Correct, so that the impact of the increase, so every year you usually see increases it didn’t impact the community’s overall budget. There was an increase I believe in 2024 on the clubhouse amounts.
Ms. DelRio: No.
Mr. Lorenzo: But I’m letting you know that the clubhouse fee, there was no increase per se.
Mr. Cubias: There was an increase in the monthly fee but in the operations. Mr. Lorenzo: Correct.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, there was in the operations but that fee has never been increase.
Mr. Lorenzo: I went back, and just to give you guys more information, back in 2023 what the District was assessing for the clubhouse alone was $448 and $506 in 2024, $560 and $448, in 2025, $609 and $154, and then this year I believe it’s $619, so it’s gone up significantly but, it hasn’t impacted the community as a whole because you guys have been using a surplus so that you guys wouldn’t see an impact that would increase the fees.
Ms. DelRio: Exactly.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, just to kind of recap, the Board entered into an agreement to sell lake capacity, and that money was what was being used to go against the budget so it doesn’t impact the residents and they don’t see an increase in fees.
Ms. DelRio: So, this amount is what is being recommended by the accountant?
Mr. Lorenzo: This is what is recommended from the accountant to get away from the surplus and using it, you guys do have the money but, it’s because of this lake project

that we might be going into it’s good to start already having a realistic budget and leaving that money aside just in case, so she’s already move $500,000 and assigned it to the lake project in case it needs to be done. It doesn’t mean it’s assigned to that, it’s just so that she knows that at least $500,000 is going to go towards the bills, so just for her sake of accounting practices just to make sure she knows it’s there. You guys could do half this year and then half next year but, she thinks the best thing to do is the full amount this year, to make sure you guys have a realistic budget and you guys are getting revenue for what it is that’s in the budget.
A resident: And what was the amount?
Mr. Lorenzo: The quantity of the increase is $552.85 per unit. A resident: Ok.
Ms. DelRio: So, if you look at it monthly it would be $46. Mr. Lorenzo: Yes, so this is an annual increase.
Ms. DelRio: So, $46.50, and basically what we need to do is make a decision for the letter to go out with this amount, and the date of the budget meeting, we can chose what we want to do.
Mr. Cubias: So, I think that’s the best practice.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, in order to go and increase a letter must be accompanied with the budget so we can notify the residents.
Ms. Trujillo: So, my question, I feel like there are still items on our budget that we can go down a little bit, that’s just my comment because I mean even thinking about it, I love events for community and I think we can even cut down what we’re spending on some of the events, when offering the food aspect and some of the events we can cut down on the cost of that, so that’s one aspect. I don’t know, I kind of took a look at the budget and even like some of the holiday decorations and things, some of the things we’ve talked about, right now we’re paying to rent them, even those ribbons things, so it’s little things but, I think bringing all these little cuts I think will help our budget overall and it’s not going to really affect the community and how everyone is enjoying the community that much, so they’re not going to notice.
Mr. Cubias: But even if we decide to increase, we’ll still be the cheapest community around.

Mr. Trujillo: I understand and I get that 100%, my concern is that we’re, and if you look at a monthly thing it’s not a big deal but, I think we have an obligation to really break it down and make sure we are looking at our budget and cutting anything that’s unnecessary before are thinking about any increase, even like adjusting certain things, I mean in getting quotes for some items, maybe seeing if we can get a better pricing.
Ms. DelRio: Well, I think we can do that between now and July, that’s something that Jesus and the team can do because right now the only thing we’re doing is because once the notice goes out, it’s going to go out for that amount. The day of the meeting, we can actually propose and say, listen, we did this, and we’re going to cut back here, and we’re going to do this here, and do that there, and you know what there’s no increase, or maybe it’s going to be $20, or maybe it’s going to be a $100 increase, whatever the case is.

trying.

Mr. Trujillo: Yes, but we owe it to the community to make sure that they see we are

Ms. DelRio: Oh yes, we’ve been trying for last 6 years.
Mr. Trujillo: Right, and I’m not saying that we haven’t because obviously we have

because we’ve been keeping it lower by subsidizing with the costs, so I get that 100% but, again, I think there are items within our budget that we can still cut down a little bit more that aren’t going to affect the livelihood of the homeowner, and especially considering the fact that we have this whole lake aspect coming up which makes me nervous, that we’re going to be hitting people on two sides.
Ms. DelRio: And not necessarily but, I can further discuss on that? Mr. Lorenzo: Let’s leave that until to the next item.
Ms. DelRio: Ok, so we will discuss about that. Mr. Lorenzo: I mean we can if you want to.
Ms. DelRio: No, just the money allocation, and one of the reason why we’re trying to do this is in the case that we do need to do the aesthetic lifting of the lake, mostly we cannot get another bond, that’s not an option.
Mr. Lorenzo: Correct.
Ms. DelRio: The government bonds are not an option because we have two of them and one of them needs to expire or liquidated before we can get another.

Mr. Lorenzo: At least more, I believe it’s 2031 or 2031 because there is a stipulation clause not allowing you take out another bond.
Ms. DelRio: Exactly, so regardless, I mean what we’re looking into now and I guess we can further discuss this throughout the meeting is that, if we’re going to come out of pocket, this money is going to serve, like he’s saying we already have $500,000 into the lake if we were to do it, just hypothetically, it’s made there for the lake but, it’s savings that we have and then we have another like $200,000 roughly.
Mr. Lorenzo: Around that amount.
Ms. DelRio: So, like $200,000 which is in the operations account, that money comes in day to day. Right now we’re running on a deficit of $250,000 that we have accumulated but, basically it’s like $60,000 a year.
Mr. Lorenzo: Correct.
Ms. DelRio: That every year, we say we’re going to cut this, and we’re going to buy the Christmas tree, and we are going to put this here, and we keep do that but, the reality is the older the building gets, the more money we need. That pool is going to have to get a diamond bright, so we need money for that.
Mr. Lorenzo: The roof on the clubhouse.
Ms. DelRio: Right, the roof on the clubhouse, so regardless we need funding for our reserves, so that $500,000 that we’re putting money into, and getting $500 extra from the community every year, that doesn’t mean that we’re going to go on a shopping spree, that’s going to go into a reserves account because if we need a roof, that’s coming out of there, if we need lake, it’s coming out of there, if we need diamond bright on the pool because kids keep throwing rocks inside the pool, it’s going to come out of there, so that’s what the community needs to see that as, that we need the full $500, we’ll make that decision in July, that we can tweak little things in the budget, I completely agree but, at the end of the day, we do need the budget, we cannot keep, and me, I believe we cannot keep running on lake amount.
Mr. Trujillo: I do agree with that, and I agree we need funds for these other items because they will come up.
Ms. DelRio: And that’s the way you need to see it, and this is the only community that has not increased a single penny during COVID, after COVID, and this is my second term on this Board, we have never increased a penny here. Not only that but, if people

remember, which they don’t, we did run operations in this clubhouse free of charge for the community for a whole year, so the community did not spend whatever tax it was supposed to be at that point I think it was like roughly $400 and change in the operations of the clubhouse, $438 or something like that, so nobody got charged for a whole year, so everything was running as normal for a whole year because we used that capacity money to do that because we needed to buy the clubhouse, it was going to be the best pricing, the best timing and it got done, and thankfully we got money for that, and we still have money, money is not an issue but, we’re getting old.
A resident: I do want to add, and this is my first meeting but as a resident, I would have to say, like what Janexy was saying we have not added a single penny for a few years now, and if we start taking little cuts here and pennies there, that does not make any sense regardless. So, as residents we do have to understand that it’s going to come up at some time, and it’s going to for our own benefit, it’s not like we’re getting that money, and putting that money up to do partying, we’re doing it because something needs to be done, so and I know that they’re going understand that, so I think everybody should understand that whatever we’re doing it going to be for our own good.
Ms. DelRio: And I see where you’re coming from, we need to keep pinching the penny.
Mr. Trujillo: And again, I think today is all about saying what our ceiling is which is fine but, I just think that we should at least give it a shot in terms of looking into if there are items that we can adjust even by a little bit, again, I don’t think it’s things that the community is going to notice in terms of their visibility but, we will notice in the money aspect at least we’ll have a little additional and maybe that’s a little addition that we could put towards these other projects coming up but, it’s stuff that I think we can look into, again, I know today is just about the ceiling.
A resident: And then we have ideas, and I don’t want to take it away from the events but, we did have ideas that we shared on the events and I don’t know if we can talk about it but, that we can do other things that people are not going to notice, like waters, get a dollar and that will cover other things, so we really don’t have to maybe spend as much but, we could come up with ideas to, as residents we don’t see and suffer the events.
Mr. Trujillo: And just to be clear, I’m not saying to take away events, I’m saying to adjust so that we can present it, for example, if we’re spending so much on just food for

everybody, which that it’s gotten to the point that there’s so many people ordering so much food, you know people can, just like what we did for Easter, purchase their own food, and it’s not really going to affect the event aspect because they’re still going to get their entertainment and the things that they have.
Ms. DelRio: Hold on, and that’s ok, and these are things that we can look into but, that’s not going to bring us back $250,000, and the money from the Christmas party that we’re going to spend on food, is not going to give us $50,000 which is the deficit that we have right now.
Mr. Trujillo: I get that but, it’s a portion of the overall pictures.
Ms. DelRio: But we still have the party rentals, they’re giving a contribution, and if I checked correctly, last year we had over $100,000 and it’s not here, you have $2,500 I don’t know why but, last year I think we had over $5,000 worth of party rental income. So, the same way and I’m a firm believer that you need to give back to the community, it’s not about collecting fees and dues, people need to see the community not only staying healthy but improving, and I believe these events are petty, and you guys can look into it.
Mr. Trujillo: And I agree with you 100% but the realty is we’re not taking anything away from the community in this aspect, we’re just looking at where we can pull a little bit so at least we’re showing to the community, we’ve made an attempt as your Board to try to cut down a little bit so that, yes, we are having to increase because this and this and this but, we’ve done this too.
Ms. DelRio: On the other hand, I think Angel and Gabriella have become very expensive, so we maybe we can reduce a little bit there, and Maria on the other hand, and so if cut down those three vendors, I think we can look for our $50,000 but I don’t know if we’re going to be running a business here.
Mr. Trujillo: And my comment again is not to say, get rid of everything, that is not my comment, my comment is to say that we should just take a look and see if there are items that maybe we can adjust that will help our bottom line in general, and also looking to other factors in terms of our clubhouse, like can the people from outside rent our clubhouse?
Ms. Fernandez: No.
Mr. Lorenzo: No, unless they’re members.
Mr. Trujillo: Ok, and there’s no way to do that, right?

Mr. Lorenzo: Well, there is a way, they pay the membership fee.
Mr. Trujillo: Up front, but unless they’re members that’s the only way. Mr. Lorenzo: Yes.
Ms. DelRio: Which I’m pretty sure a lot of people are renting on behalf of some other people, and their family or whoever is renting here, and probably it’s just the owner is coming to rent it and they’re part of the party.
Ms. Fernandez: You could always open up the membership to the public but, they just have to pay that monthly fee and then they’d be able to rent.
Mr. Trujillo: But it’s already opened to the public in general right because we promoted and said it’s open to the public.
Mr. Cubias: But they have to be a member.
Mr. Trujillo: Right, and we already advertised that the public be a member. Ms. DelRio: No, you don’t advertise.
Mr. Lorenzo: No we don’t advertise it.
Ms. Fernandez: And I think right now it’s mostly just your residents, however, if someone from the public wants they can purchase the membership, and they would be allowed in.
Mr. Trujillo: Ok, so the long story short, what I’m just trying to get across is that I think we can look at this later, as to if there are items that we can adjust, that’s it, and I understand today is about the ceiling but I just wanted to bring that up so it’s said and it’s stated that there are things I think that we can work on that will affect our bottom line overall, that’s is.
Mr. Lorenzo: Does the Board want to assign someone to work with me on this? Ms. DelRio: At reducing the budget?
Mr. Lorenzo: Yes, just as an option, and I can ask for your feedback as another approach.
Ms. DelRio: So, he does have a good point, how much are we saving on the pool service right now?
Mr. Gitel: Well, it’s way cheaper than the other one. Ms. DelRio: Yes, but still.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, you’re saving about $400 or $500 which is in the budget. Ms. DelRio: That’s $6,000.

Mr. Lorenzo: Yes.
Ms. DelRio: Because we recently changed the pool company.
Mr. Lorenzo: And I can go through some of these line items, I mean the water and sewer has been lowered from $52,000 last year to $40,000.
Ms. DelRio: And this is what you need to know, we were on a deficit and I think this year, actually our expenses went down but, the whole concept of this increase is not operational, it’s getting back those years that we’ve been using the money. So, this whole proposal of increase is not for operational reasons at this point but, to get back whatever we had given in the past for operational because now we need to get ready for the future, and for the kind of things we’re seeing. So, we cannot say, ok we didn’t increase before but, we’re going to need the money in the future, and that’s the reason why we’re trying to get it back, and like he said, we can do the $500 and change, or we can go lower, that’s something that we can determine.
Mr. Trujillo: Yes, and again, I understand what today’s meeting is in setting that ceiling but, my only purpose was to say that I think we can look at it and see if there are things that we can adjust for example like we just did for the pool, so if that’s something, then maybe we can do it for other things as well, and just save us some money and maybe that money goes towards putting it in our reserves for future things or whatever happens.
Mr. Cubias: Absolutely.
Mr. Lorenzo: Well, right now you guys have a reserve line item at $27,000, you have contingency at $38,000, and those can be changed but, it’s good to have that extra money. You guys are also collecting interest on these accounts so that’s something you guys can look at and see on page 2, and on both of the bonds you guys are collecting interest, you can see the amounts there, like for example the 2016 through February, you guys have collected $31,000, and are projecting through the end of this fiscal year $47,000 just in interest.
Ms. DelRio: And that’s on page what?
Mr. Lorenzo: On page 7 if you go to the interest earnings. Ms. DelRio: Ok.
Mr. Lorenzo: And then on page 9 you’ll see the same thing for the 2021 bonds, you guys have collected $12,000 through February and projecting $16,000 for the end of the

year, and it might be more than that. Then the rental income, I mean that’s something you don’t count on.
Ms. DelRio: I know but it was just a little highlight, and I know Maria has that still pending, I don’t know if she’s done that with Gabriella.
Ms. Fernandez: Yes, we’re going to talk about that today.
Ms. DelRio: Ok, so you want to talk about that today because some of those prices are going up on the rentals, but what was the income, it was over $5,000, right?
Mr. Lorenzo: I don’t have it listed on this budget, I would have to check the financials.
Ms. DelRio: Ok, it was something like that I remember seeing it.
Mr. Lorenzo: But that’s something you don’t count on but some of it goes towards your account, it stays in the account.
Ms. DelRio: But the way I see it is, this is income that is coming that is not even affecting our budget, because both of them are on the partying event committee, so we have Justin and Jessica both sit on the committee for events, and going back to that, I think it’s always a good thing to give back to the community.
Mr. Lorenzo: Right, and that line item we increased from $10,000 to $12,000 based on spending, and that could be adjusted, and so I can send you guys an email each individually and see what you guys think and kind of get your feedback each on the budget.
Mr. Trujillo: Sure, absolutely.
(At this point several people were talking at one time, and no one conversation could be heard)

Ms. DelRio: And listen, like you’re saying, we don’t need to do and we can be good people, oh we haven’t increased anything but, you know what, in two years we’re going to need it and another $500 or more, and Angel is going to tell us a little bit more of that in a few minutes, so it’s going to be a lot more, so when you have to hit somebody with a
$4,000 increase in their taxes, they’re going to scream, so trust me.
Mr. Trujillo: I understand what you’re saying, I get it but, we’re talking about two different things now.

Ms. DelRio: No, we are talking about the same thing, and we just want to put it on the record for whoever decides to read it, so they know. Right now we’re talking about
$500 preparing for the future.
Mr. Trujillo: I understand.
Ms. DelRio: And pay no interest, if we were to do major things in the community, like if we’re going to further discuss the lake erosion, that’s going to be a bank loan with interest, so you’re going to be paying a bank a lot of money with interest, and guess what, if we decide to go that route, if we decide to go cash, you’re going to hit everybody on other taxes at once.
Mr. Trujillo: I understand a special assessment, again, my point is not to say that we don’t maybe need to increase, my point is to say, that by increasing we need to be able to show to the community that we’ve done everything in terms of making sure that our budget is as necessary as possible.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, and also operations, and again, our operations are lower than last year, so we definitely have done our jobs.
Mr. Trujillo: And I see what you’re saying, and I’m not arguing with you.
Ms. DelRio: No, but I just want to make it clear because if we were to look at our budget without an increase, it went down how much, our operational?
Mr. Lorenzo: It went down on the clubhouse side, they went down $8,000. Ms. DelRio: The operations.
Mr. Lorenzo: Approximately.
A resident: It’s also going to perspective because people are going to complain regardless if you increase or if you don’t but, I think the majority of the community they understand and they see that it’s good.
(At this point several people were talking at one time, and no one conversation could be heard)

Mr. Lorenzo: So, if you’re going on the increase based on last year, it would be about at $10,000 to $15,000 increase as a whole without the carry forward and so forth, that would technically be the change from 2026 fiscal year to 2027.
Mr. Trujillo: So again, my point is and we’re here to set the ceiling which is fine, so let’s do that, and then we’ll discuss the adjustments.

Ms. DelRio: So, you can do the motion. Mr. Trujillo: Ok, so I make a motion.
Ms. DelRio: So, we’re making a motion to set the ceiling for the budget, and what would that be?
Mr. Lorenzo: So, I’m going to read the agenda item for the motion, so it would be consideration of resolution #2026-02 approving the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget and setting the public hearing, the Board would like to move forward with the budget as proposed and also setting the public hearing, so the meeting dates that you guys have available that are currently advertised are June 17th, July 15th and August 19th, which would comply with the 60 day minimum to adopt the budget, so it’s basically a decision upon your availability.
Ms. DelRio: So, it would be June 17th or July 15th.
Mr. Lorenzo: Correct, or August 19th, preferably I would say June or July. Ms. DelRio: Yes, June 17th, is everybody available June 17th, I am.
Mr. Trujillo: I’m here, I think July is when I’m not.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, I think July gets hectic for everybody. Mr. Trujillo: So June is good.
Ms. DelRio: So June 17th? Mr. Cubias: That’s fine.
Mr. Lorenzo: Ok, so June 17th, everybody is in agreement. So, I’m just going to repeat the motion one more time, it would be consideration of resolution #2026-02 approving the fiscal year 2027 budget and setting the public hearing for June 17, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. here at the Satori Clubhouse in Miami Lakes, 8875 NW 155th Terrace, Miami Lakes, Florida and then approving the assessed amounts for townhomes, $4,402.09 and for single family homes $5,020.81.

On MOTION by Mr. Trujillo seconded by Ms. DelRio with all in favor, Resolution #2026-02 approving the proposed Fiscal Year 2027 Budget with the increase of $552.85 per unit, and setting the Public Hearing on June 17th, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. at 8875 NW 155th Terrace, Miami Lakes, Florida was approved.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion of Procedures for
the General Election
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving forward to the discussion of procedures for the general election. If you guys go to page 60, you guys will see the notice of qualifying period for candidates for the Board of Supervisors for the Community Development District. The seats that are up for the general are seats #3, #4 and #5, so seat #3 is Justin Trujillo, seat #4 is Mario Cubias, and then seat #5 is the open seat. The biggest emphasis I wish to drive home is making sure that if you guys are interested in running again, I’m going to go over the qualifying period shortly and make sure you guys identify the correct seat number, and don’t run against each other. So, Justin, you’re seat #3, no I’m sorry, Mario you’re seat #3, and Justin is seat #4. I will be sending you guys emails with more information but, I’m going to go through it briefly here, the qualifying window for the Community Development District positions is from 12:00 noon on Monday, June 8, 2026 through 12:00 noon, Friday, June 12, 2026, and for whatever reason you guys are unable to stop by their office through that qualifying window, their office will accept qualifying papers up to 14 days in advance.
Mr. Truillo: Can you remind us with an email?
Mr. Lorenzo: Yes, I’m going to send you guys an email but, I just wanted to go over it briefly here, you have 14 days before, and 14 days before is Monday, May 25th which is Memorial Day if I’m not mistaken and their office might be closed, so it would be the 26th which would be 13 days in advance. I will send you guys the information with the mailing address and I’ll send you guys the form, and more information, and if you guys have any questions just let me know. You guys will see the information sheet with more information on pages 61 and 62, and if you have any questions feel free to reach out to me, and I’m going to send you an email with the information individually to make sure you guys are informed, and that’s pretty much it.
Ms. Fernandez: Just really quick, in addition to that, usually your Form 1, statement of financial interest is due July 1st but, it’s one of the requirements when you qualify, so just have it done when you go to the office that way they don’t turn you away, so you’ll have to do it early this year, your Form 1 because that’s one of they requirements.
Mr. Trujillo: Ok.
Mr. Cubias: And will you include that in the email so we do that.

Mr. Lorenzo: Yes, I will send that in the email.
Ms. Fernandez: And it should be easier because the information just self-populates now that you have the online version, so it should be quicker than when you originally did it.
Mr. Trujillo: Yes.
Mr. Lorenzo: And Illesy you don’t have that deadline because you’re a new Board member, but I’ll send you all the information because you do have to fill out a Form 1, the first time it’s a little tedious because it’s the first time but, after that the information populates itself, so it’s a lot easier to renew it. The Commission on Ethics, as you guys know and we’re going to be sending emails too very soon that you have to finish your ethics training by December 31, 2026 the same thing you guys did last year, there’s free courses, there’s ones that you guys can pay for, and again, Illesy I’ll send you the information, there’s a course that each Board Supervisors needs to take by the end of the year. It’s on the honor system so you can just save it and you guys can just send it to us and we’ll put it in a file and we’ll go over it with you. Just so you guys know there’s free ones and then there’s ones you guys can pay for if you want.
Ms. Fernandez: And this year’s Form 1 you’re going to be stipulating that you did the ethics training in 2025.
Mr. Lorenzo: Correct.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving forward to staff reports, tab A is the attorney update on the amendments to Satori Club rules and regulations.

Attorney – Update on Amendments to Satori Club Rules and Regulations
Ms. Fernandez: And before I get into that I have a couple of updates for the Board from the last meeting, so in response to Mario’s inquiry about the donating gym equipment, we don’t need to do a resolution, you could just donate, however, we recommend that whatever equipment is going to be donated that it’s reviewed by the manager and the insurance company so that there are no issues in terms of liability and then we can go ahead and donate that equipment.
Mr. Cubias: Ok.

Mr. Lorenzo: So, do they have to declare it as excess property?
Ms. Fernandez: No, usually in the surplus resolution, it has to be done by resolution to declare the property that’s already excess or surplus, but since this is just a donation we just recommend that it’s review by you to make sure it’s in good working order and by the insurance to make sure that moving forward if there’s any liability issue.
Mr. Lorenzo: Ok, got it.
Ms. Fernandez: And the second update before the rules that I have, in effort to mitigate the lake issue and finances, I did review the purchase and sales agreement for the lake capacity agreement, however, the $800,000 was a one-time cost and maintenance is on the grantor, which would be us, so there’s no way that we can get any additional funds through that agreement, so those were my two updates that I had for you besides the rules.
Ms. Hernandez: So I started reviewing them, the rules and checking to see what we have, we can do amendments, I did more or less a little draft and I have to finalize it, and I’d like to review it with Gabriella, and then finalize and hopefully by next week I’ll send this up to you.
Ms. Fernandez: Perfect thank you, so once I get that I will make the changes bring it to you guys next meeting, and once that gets formed and approved by motion, we can get started on the public hearing process to formally adopt the rules, and that’s all I have for you guys unless you have any specific questions for me.
Mr. Lorenzo: Thank you Gabby.

Engineer
Discussion of Lake Erosion Analysis Proposals:
Ecological Improvements
Landshore Enterprises, LLC
Nino & Moreno, Inc.
Florida International Engineering, Inc.
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving forward to the engineer, so this is the discussion of the lake erosion analysis proposals. The engineer team has obtained 4 proposal which you guys will see them in your package, A, B, C and D, so A, B, and C, Ecological Improvements, Landshore Enterprises.
Ms. Del Rio: What page is that?

Mr. Lorenzo: That starts on page 63 it’s the first proposal which is Ecological Improvements, following that you have the one from Landshore Enterprises, and then Nino & Moreno which is C, and Florida International Engineering which is D, all of them are apples to apples with the exception of Florida International Engineering, there are still items missing, and we’ve reached out to them to get an update, I haven’t received a response yet. I’m not sure if they’re working on that but, I’ll let Angel chime in a little bit more, and I don’t know if the Board has any questions.
Mr. Camacho: Yes. So we were able to final obtain additional proposals. We reached out to someone from South Carolina but, they do work in South Florida. Then Nino & Moreno, were the actual civil engineers, they came in as a geo technical firm to help prepare this proposal, they also came in at the lowest price with $24.600,
Mr. Lorenzo: So, Ecological Improvements is $29,340, Landshore is $35,600, Nino & Merano is $24,600, and the incomplete one from Florida International Engineering was
$27,800. This is for the lake analysis only, this is not for the work. This includes construction plans and the whole 9 yards to make sure the soil is tested and everything.
Mr. Camacho: (inaudible comment)
Mr. Trujillo: Do we know like what they’ve done in the past in terms of similar situations?
Mr. Camacho: Which ones?
Mr. Trujillo: Any of them, like do we know any of the track records of similar jobs that they’ve completed?
Mr. Camacho: Well, we have not worked with any of these companies, other than Landshore Enterprises. (inaudible comment)
Mr. Trujillo: Landshore is the one that you’ve worked with in the past.
Mr. Camacho: Yes. (inaudible comment) It’s typical of a civil engineering firm, they have a good geotechnical team to provide their opinion, and they’re scope of work is thorough. (inaudible comment) Other than typical cross sections and structural items, it all comes down to what the geotechnical team finds during their analysis and testing of the soil. (inaudible comment)
Mr. Trujillo: And I only ask because that’s how I look at everything, as I always say like, what have you done to show me that I can trust you in terms of your opinion and that

isn’t going to be something like we select this company and we’re going to regret that we selected them, and I don’t know if that makes sense.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, Landshore we’ve used I believe in another District that we manage if I’m not mistaken it’s Griffin Lakes.
Mr. Camacho: So, Landshore, out of all the Districts that our District engineers work, I’ve probably done 6 of them (inaudible comment) So our firm has more experience with Landshore, as far as the analysis goes, they’ve done an analysis for different Districts and we haven’t work with these other vendors other than their professional engineers.
Ms. DelRio: So, basically I’ve done a little research myself and I just wanted to share this with Jesus. I went into the Property Appraiser’s website and if you go there you can see, again for the record, the lake, I think it was created in 1982, and when you talk about erosion is the lake is becoming bigger so that’s what erosion does, it creates a water mass, it becomes bigger because it starts eating off the walls. So, when I started looking back and I think this picture, and I’m going to walk around with my phone to share with you guys, I have a picture here from the Property Appraiser’s website from 2016 when there was no houses, there was nothing here, there was erosion already. Then when you look at today, we have grass and sand, and we have all this land that we didn’t have in 2016 and homes, and when you see between, which I already sent to Jesus, you also see the construction, so what happened here. I believe what happened, and this is what I was telling him that makes me very upset is Lennar did the filling of the community, and whatever was left over they just threw it into the lake, they just dumped it there, they didn’t do it correctly, they didn’t compress it, and now they’re expecting us to do it. I think, and this is just me, very vague, the lake is just going back to its nature, it’s going to go back to where it was, it’s not going to go beyond. So, at this point the way I feel is, I don’t think we need this testing right now, I don’t think we need to do the cosmetic work that is going to cost the community a lot of money that we don’t have and this is just me sharing with the rest of you. I would like to know, let’s do some reverse engineering, how much would it cost because most of these companies are saying, ok we’re going to put the $20,000 something or $30,000 into the fixing of the lake. So, let’s do it the other way around, let’s have those companies come and say, ok, because we know what the fix is going to be, we know what the procedure is. Now, just come to us and tell us, this is how much it’s going to be to fix it, and then you do your engineering work and you dump it in there, and you

subtract, add whatever you need to do and get it done. What I’m also concerned about is how much work is that going to take into the community, how much damage, how much destruction are we going to create into this community to fix the lake slope which is going to be cosmetic at this point because from what I see here, and if you were to show this to an engineer which I’m going to show it to Angel now, he’s going to see. This is 2016, and look at our property line there, this is now, all that was added by Lennar, so the lake is just going back there again, eventually, so you want to see it here. So, this is 2016, this is the corner, and that corner, and this is 2016, there’s nothing there, and this is today, you see, look at all the land that they added, and of course we’re getting the erosion because that was not done properly. So, where is this exactly, this exactly is here is what we’re looking at, this section right here where we have 10 and 9, that’s this corner right here, it’s 9. So, all this linear area is going to retract a lot, which is fine, no houses are going to fall, maybe this house is going to fall because it’s very close, and I was looking at it, you live around here, and that’s the biggest erosion that we have, we have 14 and 15 there, so if a house is going fall or a pool, it’s going to be his, and I’m trying to be the devil’s advocate here. So, let’s say we go with this, and we pay $30,000 to somebody, and when we pay a few million, and we send a special assessment of I don’t know, $4,000 a year, one year, to everybody in this community, just for a scenario, how are we going to get that equipment back there. How are we going to get this work done, just for the community to look better. How much of the community are we going to destroy, what other equipment are we going to have to bring back there, what houses are we going to have to go through and destroy gardens to do this work that is going to be cosmetic. So, in order to make something pretty, how much of the community are we going to have to destroy, and how many people are we going to make uncomfortable, and how many open cans of liability are we going to create because he’s going to be on the list, and I’m sorry to keep point him out because he’s here, and he’s going to be the first one on the list because at that point, at the moment that we start working on his backyard, whatever happens to his pool is going to become our responsibility because we handled the land behind him. So, are we really ready for this, is this something that we really want to get into because I don’t. In this case, I want to be the Board member that going to say, you know what, I’m going to keep money in there and I’m going to make sure that whoever comes in the future wants to deal with that and deal with angry people and their pools are falling apart but, look at it, think

about it, how much destruction are we going to create to do this, think about it. Not only that, how about unfortunately, I live on the lake, and we have another person that lives here, it so happens, 13, another section, they’re already building a pool there, they just throw sand in the backyard, about 3 feet of sand, not only for the lake, but for the neighbors, now his house is like 2 feet above the others, so al the water is going to the neighbors, that’s wrong, that should be completely stopped immediately, and that erosion right there in that section is already at 13. So, to me, I would table this topic right now, I would save money, and that’s what we’re trying to do, and keep an eye on it, that’s why we have Angel on payroll at $50,000, just to keep an eye on that, and we’re trying to save money.
A resident: So, now I have a question, instead of spending all this money is there another way of cleaning the lake like to help slow the process or anything like that?
Mr. Camacho: Well, you have to basically remain the slope, so that means putting earth inside there and then putting barriers.
Ms. DelRio: Well, we don’t have to do the barrier, like Landshore I think those are the ones that was here, and so Landshore, the way they do it is we’re going to have to dump 68 trucks or 63 trucks of sand, and then you put like these sleeves, and the sleeves get filled with sand, and that’s going to hold the shore, and then you put grass, it’s like a cute retaining wall, it’s not going to be complete, it’s going to be like some type of thing they put there with sand, and then they throw grass, and then it’s not going to move, it’s going to look pretty. It’s super expensive because I don’t know, what’s the diameter or the linear foot Angel?
Mr. Camacho: Based on the analysis they’ll have one that’s submerged, and then one that’s laid on top, that’s essential too that they cut off in places.
Ms. DelRio: So what’s the linear feet? Mr. Camacho: (inaudible comment)
Ms. DelRio: I think it’s 68 acres or 67, so doing the linear, so you can have an idea, the linear foot of that kind of material is like doing a seawall in a house in the water.
Mr. Lorenzo: So it would be 8,362 linear feet.
Ms. DelRio: Ok, so 8,362 times $91 per foot, so we’re looking at about $800 which I don’t think is the magic number, we’re looking into the millions to fix this. Now, we have another solution that I was thinking about, and he’s not going to like it but, house is

affected, you want to keep your pool, so I think he should fix his lake slope. I think the builder damaged it for whatever reason, or we even have to look at his house, and see how it compares to 2014. So, we can go to these sections, that most of those people have pools, and they should fix their own line right there.
Mr. Trujillo: Because you’re saying the pools are the main area.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, definitely when they build a pool they’re killing the slope of the lake, and some of these pools are very lifted and what happens is, Angel, you can correct if I’m wrong, so when you build a pool, you build a pool, you have a lot of people putting a lot of turf which is not allowed in Miami Lakes, that’s why Miami Lakes makes you do grass and they give you a final inspect and a lot of people in the community go ahead and change to turf. So what happens is turf doesn’t absorb the water because you have sand and other things, so what happens, these houses are very high, you’re supposed to have a slope like this and then the sand goes into the lake. So, when you have these little things, everything, Miami people use a lot of Chlorox, Fabuloso, you name it, we use all of that in the deck back there, when you throw a little water, it goes into the little drench and it goes down but, when it goes into this little drench, it filters, it takes care of other things and then the water just goes back into the lake, and that helps not getting things killed. So, when you have a house like this, you put all these things and the water is just going right here, right into the lake, and we also get algae because of that, green algae, we kill other grass around it, all that natural weed that is supposed to grow, so it can kill the ecosystem, not to much now because we do have maintenance for the lake and I think the lake stays very healthy but, when it starts killing different living environments around it, it’s easier for the erosion to happen.
A resident: So at this point it’s either, it’s millions of dollars to repair the lake and then at the end as residents they’re going to be paying for it, and if you don’t have lake or residents that do have a lake take accountability and fix the other side.
Mr. Serrano: But to that point, which is ok you guys have it like that but, I have pictures for example when I purchased the house before we built the pool, and I also spoke to Jesus a couple of days ago, where I can exactly show and prove that the pool company who built my pool, they didn’t affect the slope or the flat part of the land, so I prove, and in fact my neighbor his is like way higher than my land, and when it rains, all that water is coming to my area, so to that point where the slope, I get your point why

you’re coming up with that but, for example I have pictures where I can show that the land was like super steep even before I purchased the house.
Mr. Lorenzo: And just for the sake of the recording can you state your name? Mr. Serrano: Yes, my name is Andre Serrano.
Ms. DelRio: And the way I see it, this would be optional, it’s your pool that is eventually going to collapse, so I think it’s in your best interest to do something to fix that because your house is the biggest erosion area, so I’m not going to be affected because definitely I’m not going to get a tax on my property and he’s not going to, and nobody else is going to, and my pool is very far from the lake, so I’m not going to but, you are. So, I think it’s more to your benefit to do something like that to keep your pool, that’s the way I see it. Now the CDD, like similar to what the HOA is doing, that you can bet a better price because let’s say ok we have these homes that they need to do this, and the price is going to be this much, and then you can do the analysis there and you can factor it in and where by yourself, and I don’t know, I’m just throwing a number out there, I have no idea, it’s going to be $10,000, now because the CDD is in the middle and he’s going to do it for you maybe, and then tax you independently for fixing it, it’s going to be $8,000 or $7,000, and then you take care of that problem, so that could be a solution.
Mr. Serrano: But the point is the CDD should be pursuing more of what we can do with Lennar, or what we can do with the city because this is a lake for stormwater, so every time you dump water and you pull water out, it creates erosion.
Ms. DelRio: And let me show you this picture to Gabriella, so Gabby look, and let me start from here, for instance this is 2016, so this section right here, this is the corner lake you’re looking at. So, in 2016 it was like this, no building, no nothing, and this is what you see now. So, all the dumping was done through the grass there, and they sold us, and I mean this is the property line, so eventually the lake is going to go there. So, the way I feel is that a lot of entities failed to the community because when Lennar decided to do that nobody went and checked and said, ok this is going to erode and go back because the same way that they hit us with the CDD for our sewer and infrastructure, you know what, we’re going to do this, we should do this slope at once, they should have done it back then because I think what they sold was false, it was temporary and to me that’s fraud because when you see something like that and you see the lake all the way over there and the lake has been here, it was not the way they sold it to us, the lake has been here for 82 years,

and now they’re saying, we’re creating this crises that the lake is eroding, it has erosion. So, yes, it does have erosion but, it’s erosion that was provoked for something that was done wrong by the developer, and it went through different levels of approval because that shouldn’t be approved like that, they just threw the sand there, and covered it with grass and here you go, they transferred it to the District, that’s a done deal.
Ms. Fernandez: The issue with that is being able to prove that, and we have a meeting to discuss this situation, along another situation with one of the partners in the firm that has more background with the attorney here many years ago to see what we can do, and I can bring up the idea, go through the documents, and see if it’s even possible, however, just like last time the issue here is it’s difficult to prove because the only evidence we have right now is the Property Appraisers photo evidence, there wasn’t any surveys done or studies done or lake erosion analysis done.
Ms. DelRio: Which isn’t really fair, you’re building a 482 community, and you’re not doing a survey on the lake.
Ms. Fernandez: Ok, again, you can claim whatever you want, the problem is being able to prove that and also being within the Statute of Limitations for that. So, we’re going to look into and discuss it, and we’ll bring it back at least that aspect of this next meeting with what we come up with, speaking to the partners, because it’s also tied into another issue we have that people who are building pools facilitated through the HOA are not following guidelines that the CDD set back in 2022 and that also plays a big part in where we are today with the lake erosion. So, we have to get our ducks in a row with the HOA, making sure that they are following those guidelines to prevent any further issue with the lake, and further damage because these were enacted in 2022 and it seems like they’re not being followed which is why this issue is progressively getting worse. It’s not to say that people building pools in the community is the reason that we have this lake erosion, however, it’s not specifically the issue at hand.
Ms. DelRio: I see more future problems.
Mr. Serrano: The pool is going to the lake little by little because everything that supports it is getting smaller and smaller.
A resident: (inaudible comment) Many of the problems we have with the pools on the lake have been CDD responsibility, and I’m going to tell you why, and I’m going to show you the pictures. We’ve been owning the houses, and part of the approval, we’ve

been going to every pool that has problems in the lake, and I don’t see the actions of the CDD has been strong enough to stop the problem we have right now.
Ms. Fernandez: Well, just to clarify the CDD is not going to have enforcement mechanism for that issue, that’s an issue that needs to get siphoned through the HOA because the HOA is the entity that is sending these approval letters to these homeowners in order for them to obtain a permit with the city and the town, that’s not an enforcement mechanism that can be done through the CDD.
Ms. DelRio: Well, the HOA does not provide a letter to the city, this town does not require a letter because this is an issue we’ve been having since the beginning with the town because they made the homeowners do an affidavit, that they came to the HOA, and asked for a permit but, they don’t get a letter from us. We assign them a letter after they get the town permit, we do a conditional letter.
Ms. Fernandez: But this is all done through the HOA.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, I understand that section but, what’s going on for instance, right now we have all these pools when they get done on the lake, they encroach into the lake bank so that’s where we involved the CDD.
Ms. Fernandez: Correct.
Ms. DelRio: So, what happens is, and I know Jesus has been working very actively with the town, and the town seems to be, or is trying to detach a little bit, because I did see that email, the one that you’re referring to which is completely wrong because they just sign an affidavit, there’s no letter involved, the letter you get after the town provides it. So, we’re talking about the town giving us a letter on how the pool is, they don’t require the letter, it’s an affidavit to the homeowner, and they came here first, and then they are aware that they live in a HOA, and they need to get a permit but, what happens is we follow with the town because it is an architectural design so it’s a town requirement on a pool but, on those who are encroaching, and she has walked them, yesterday we had a vendor that came in and dumped more sand for the pool but, I think they should be completely stopped.
Mr. Trujillo: We didn’t approve those plans.
Ms. DelRio: And they’re not approved by the HOA, like this one in particular, they’re not approved because they had a vendor, and the vendor abandoned the work, and the work was never approved, it was denied, and the pool is actually encroaching into the lake.

Ms. Fernandez: So, all that we can do on our end as the CDD because we own the lake, and the lake banks, and correct me if I’m wrong but, on the enforcement mechanism side of the encroachment where we can remove the encroachment, go back restore the property to how it was and charge it to that specific homeowner, that’s all we can do. We cannot stop the pool process, that has to be enforcement mechanism done through the HOA because under Florida Statutes we don’t have those types of enforcement mechanisms. Our options are limited to calling the police, or what’s under that Statute, and to that Statute if someone is on our property without permission we are allow to restore it back to how it was at their expense but, through the pool process that has to be an enforcement mechanism done through the HOA because they have those powers through the way that they collect and assess their fee. We have a meeting, I’m going to discuss this, I’m going to bring up all the points to the partner, see what options that we possibly have, I can’t promise you there’s going to be any. If there’s not I’m going to present the options, and we’re going to have the discussion to see, however, at this moment at least from what I see in my opinion, we have the enforcement mechanism for the encroachment but, not on the process of the pool, and in moving forward I would recommend that the HOA figure something out in terms of following those guidelines that we established in 2022 to prevent this issue in the future because I think that’s a lot of what the issue is because that resolution defines rules that the homeowner is supposed to follow in building their pool and it seems like even past that point no one has followed those rules. So, again, we’re limited in what a CDD can enforce, and I’m going to see what those enforcement options are but, I can’t make any promises but, I will do my best to reach them.
A resident: I have a question. (inaudible comment) Ms. DelRio: No, the CDD can do that.
Ms. Fernandez: Yes, you can restore your property to how it’s supposed to be, especially if someone came in and illegally encroached on the property, meaning they came in and did something they were not allowed to do on someone else’s property without permission. However, in terms of stopping people from building the pool, preventing people from building a pool, that needs to be done through the HOA.
A resident: (inaudible comment) But the point is we need to correct the erosion because it keeps growing, (inaudible comment) so we need to correct that problem now

that we stopped it but you guys have to do that process. (inaudible comment) because if we don’t do it, it’s going to keep happening.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, this homeowner has received three letters and the latest one had been returned, and they don’t have any other address on the Property Appraiser’s website.
Ms. Fernandez: Do we have any email or contact information?
Mr. Lorenzo: We just got the email contact information so we’re going to try that route to see.
Ms. Fernandez: Yes, I would recommend sending the letter via email, and ensure that we’ve exhausted all avenues in letting them know and giving them notice, providing them an opportunity to be heard but, after that we can start the process in terms of the encroachment portion of this issue.
Ms. Hernandez: And I’ll send them a letter as part of the HOA to stop all work until all work from the new contractor is submitted and approved.
Ms. Fernandez: And I would also attach, I mean because this resolution has rules that are supposed to be followed.
Ms. Hernandez: I’ll look at it.
Mr. Lorenzo: There’s a drainage that they’re supposed to install per the resolution because of the lake.
Ms. Hernandez: Ok.
Mr. Camacho But in addition to that, anyone that changes the trench or the swale, and they want to go with that trench option that we provided, you still have to go to DERM and do a modification through the originally permitted. So, any home that wanted to take that option that we provided, I would produce a set of plans that we can modify to get the permit approved. (inaudible comment) So, that would include the modified plan to include the trench as opposed to the original berm and go from there.
Ms. Fernandez: The issue seems to be that either homeowners, and I don’t know, taking it upon themselves to build the pools or they’re receiving approval to build these pools but they’re not following the enacted guidelines to build it.
A resident: (inaudible comment)
Ms. Hernandez: So, the HOA has to add an statement saying that they need a signed letter from the contractor that they will follow every check point to build the pool.

Ms. Fernandez: That’s why we’re seeing that aspect, and again, I would like to speak about this with Jesus, probably even Angel and the partner at the firm, however, in terms of that and not following the guidelines that I feel is something that can also be enforced with the HOA where you can assess fines. As a CDD we’re not allowed do that, and you can assess fines, and the attorney can with that process of fixing the slope and correcting that issue because on our end we can only fix the encroachment issue but, that’s not going to stop people in the future from doing the same thing.
Mr. Cubias: But we had a similar situation that one homeowner fixed the slope and he did it poorly.
Mr. Lorenzo: Sorry to interrupt but, just for the sake of the recorder, please just speak on at a time just to make sure the recorder can pick up your voice.
Mr. Cubias: Ok, so he did fix the slope but, he didn’t do it properly so if this homeowner fixed this, it should be evaluated to say, this is not the way to do it, what are the setbacks, what you took into consideration, how long is this going to last, and that probably could be a solution.
A resident: I would need the support of the CDD to do that because in this case the slope was reduced about 5 feet or 6 feet, so it was like this.
Ms. DelRio: And going back to address that, he’s here. Ms. Hernandez: He’s here, so I know he wants a solution. Mr. Cubias: So the one with the worst corrosion.
Ms. DelRio: So, for instance his house that he said he bought it like that, and then he said he never had a slope problem how are we going to fix that.
Ms. Fernandez:	He’s saying he purchased the property and it was already like

that?

Ms. DelRio: Yes.
Ms. Fernandez: The problem is when you purchase your house, you’re purchasing

it as-is, so you have the property as-is.
Ms. DelRio: So, who’s responsible for the slope in this case?
Ms. Fernandez: He would because you’re accepting the property as-is.
A resident:	And if there’s a problem that was from before, like for example, you giving the example of the pool.

Ms. DelRio: No, we’re not talking about that, just the slope, and if we’re going to go now to Jesus and say, listen send final letters to all those homeowner that don’t have the slope that they have to fix it, like in your case, that would happen right now how we’ll address that, he goes the same way?
Ms. Fernandez: The more time this goes into property law, it’s on you as a homeowner where all you could essentially do is stop the sale of the property because there was some sort of lien or encumbrance on the property which would have been then encroaching on District property and not following those guidelines but, as of right now that would only be to stop the sale of the property and for you to exit purchasing the property, that’s not going to address the issue that’s happening now with encroachment. It kind of now falls on to you to purchase it, and you purchased it as-is and there’s not really a remedy for that, even if there is, that would be you individually with whoever you purchased the house from.
A resident: (inaudible comment) But when it got purchased the house there was no wording as-is saying, hey are you accepting on buying a house that has this issue then that is something I would say, ok maybe I won’t but, if there was an issue before which there wasn’t.
Ms. Fernandez: That was on them, that’s why I said, at that point when you were purchasing the property, you enter into this agreement to purchase the property, if it came up at that time that there was an encumbrance or there was an encroachment, there was a lien, and this could have fallen under that issue, then you could have been able to pull out of the sale but, that’s doesn’t address any issues right now where you’ve already purchased the house, and you’ve already accepted it in as-is condition. So now, this issue falls on to you, and if you did want to enforce anything it wouldn’t be necessarily against the CDD, it would be with the former homeowner that you purchased the house from but, I can’t even promise you that there’s any sort of action because all you could have done was pull out of the sale at that time.
Mr. Trujillo: And they would have known about the issue.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, because like in his case, I haven’t seen it but, Jesus had to explain it to me it’s a cliff.
A resident: No, in this case the erosion is worst one. Ms. DelRio: Yes, it’s the worst erosion.

A resident: And it can affect your pool. A resident: Yes, I know.
(At this point several people were talking at one time, and no one conversation could be heard)

A resident: Right, and for example when we built the pool they brought it up, they said we might have to do a retainer wall, and I didn’t know about those things, so I said you’re the professional you go check it, and whatever has to be done as far as safety, you do it.
A resident: (inaudible comment) A resident: No, I agree.
A resident: So maybe it was to tell you, listen you need to have a setback of this amount of feet because we’re going to encroach on this part of the property that is not yours.
Mr. Trujillo: So, I’m sorry to interrupt but, I think we’re getting off track, the goal of what we’re supposed to be speaking about, we’re talking about something else, and we need to get back on to the agenda so we can move on because It’s a long agenda and we’ve already been here a while since it’s 11:00 o’clock but, having said that, I think going back to the original think and then I think we need to move on, and that is I think Daniel brought up good point which is, if the other people who are benefiting from our lake too, I think we should also look into that aspect, if they’re benefiting off the lake we need to see if they can also assist in this instance because if there is no lake to benefit off of, they’re not going to be able to benefit, so we need to look at that and say, ok you are benefiting from this lake, and this lake has this issue, we need you to assist in this situation.
A resident: (inaudible comment)
Mr. Trujillo: Right, and I understand what she says on the contract it says this.
Ms. Fernandez: Well, we’ve already established that issue, there is no way to receive funds through the lake capacity agreement, we exhausted that avenue.
Mr. Trujillo: Right, so it doesn’t say contractually but now we need to go and tell everyone we have this issue, you are benefiting off of the lake that we have and if there is no lake for you to have this benefit.
Ms. DelRio: Oh no, they’re going to have a lake, it’s just going to be bigger.

A resident: (inaudible comment)
Ms. DelRio: Because at the end of the day we need funds and they know where the money is, if this is a situation the homeowner needs to go through and get this straight, and we have all these costs, they can always go to the state for grants, and if this is something that they want to do willingly by all means.
Ms. Fernandez: So, as concerned residents of the District we can encourage each and every one of you individually so it is not a Sunshine violation to speak with your commission.
Ms. DelRio: And you cannot do that as the attorney to contact them?
Ms. Fernandez: No, so you guys as voters, as residents of your city you’re going to have more pull than Jesus is going to have, or I’m going to have, or Angel is going to have because again, you guys are the individuals who place these people in their capacity as city officials, so you are going to have more pull than we do. So, I’m going to present every single option that we have, bring you guys back those findings and see how we can move forward with this issue, again, just for the record, and for everyone again, the lake capacity, we can’t pursue that avenue, however, it doesn’t mean that we can’t pursue another one, we’re going to have that meeting, likely with Angel as well, and see what we can do.
Ms. DelRio: And moving forward we can move that item out of the agenda. I don’t know if the rest of the Board members agree but, I think at this point, and I don’t know if you all agree with me but, it’s more aesthetic what we have to do at this point. One, the funding is not there, two we’re not putting in on the budget this year, and three there’s no follow up on here.
A resident: To afford it we would have to do a special assessment.
Ms. DelRio: Exactly, and that definitely is not on this budget for this year, so I don’t see the rush where we need, and again, we would need to pick a company to come and check on the lake because in order to do that, the funds are there in the future if you wanted to do it but, I would personally do it the other way around, where we a quote, if we want to go that route on how much it would be to fix the entire lake bank and how much destruction, I’m really concerned about the logistics and how much are we going to destroy of our community to beautify something else because we’re going to be destroying here to make this beautiful and then we need to build this again, so we need to have that clear.

A resident: (inaudible comment)
Ms. DelRio: I have no idea what is done. A resident: (inaudible comment)
A resident: So, the way they do is, they find an area or an easement, they put up the sand and everything there, they create path around the lake, they don’t even touch the easement, so around the lake they make a path and from there they work their way up the path to the property.
Ms. DelRio: So, are you going to have 20,000 people just moving sand, 60 something trucks of sand.
A resident: (inaudible comment) Ms. DelRio: Exactly.
Mr. Lorenzo: In order to get the pricing Angel, correct me if I’m wrong, we need this analysis to be done because if not we’re going to have different proposals.
Mr. Camacho: You can have different vendors with different proposals. (inaudible comment) So, they’ll have different approaches, which is fine, as long as it restores the lake bank to its original slope.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, and eventually if we were to go that route and pick somebody I guess they’ll do the analysis at that time and not charge us for it because that’s what they all claim they’re going to do, or we can go by the option of individual fixing of the area because as you can see it’s just certain areas.
Ms. Fernandez: I was thinking it’s like you said, it’s a good idea to hold off, see what we can do on the next meeting or whatever because I am going to touch base back on this.
Ms. DelRio: And again, I don’t think is fair for everybody, and we’re talking about a lot of money, and so my motion would be to table this.
Mr. Trujillo: Alright.
Mr. Camacho: I would recommend that a lot of the area of concern because of these homes, I think we need to figure out this issue first, what’s the process for this, and then when those areas of the shoreline are restored then you would have maybe less erosion than what you originally thought. (inaudible comment)
Mr. Trujillo: Ok, so I make motion to table this item.
Ms. Fernandez: You don’t have to motion for that, it would just be tabled.

Mr. Lorenzo: Yes, it just has to be tabled. Ms. DelRio: Ok.
Ms. Fernandez:	And we’ll have that staff discussion and then next meeting we’ll have those answers.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, does anybody else have any questions?

Club
Weekly Reports
Joint Discussion
Mr. Lorenzo: So moving forward to club, weekly reports on page 102, Maria.
Ms. Hernandez: Yes, basically my report is what’s on the report of all the tasks and things completed for that month, so whatever is reflected on the report.
Mr. Lorenzo: Do you have anything to present Maria, or are there any questions for Maria?
Ms. Hernandez: No to present.
Mr. Lorenzo: No questions, alright moving forward to joint discussion, I’m not sure what this is for.
Ms. Fernandez: Oh the joint discussion was just between us two, I guess they added it also to the agenda.
Mr. Lorenzo: Ok, that’s what I figured too with regards to the rules.

Field Manager – Monthly Report
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving on, as far as the field, does anybody have any questions regarding my report? Hearing none, just to give you guys an update, the fountains are working fine, they look good. They painted the arch on 154th entrance and exit which looks good, the lights are working, if there’s any issues with the lights, they’re brand new, let me know.
Mr. Trujillo: The only thing I do notice is that sometimes you come into the community and I don’t know if it’s with the time changes and stuff that they’re not on when it gets dark.
Mr. Lorenzo: And which one, or what time is it? Mr. Trujillo: It’s at the main entrance.
Mr. Lorenzo: At 154th?
Mr. Trujillo: Yes, and I’m trying to think what time, I think it was dark already.

Mr. Lorenzo: In the morning or in the evening? Mr. Trujillo: Evening.
Mr. Lorenzo: Ok.
Mr. Trujillo: So, I don’t know if we could just check the time that these are being turned because even when the sun is going down those things should be on, I feel like, so it doesn’t look like we have a no name community.
Mr. Lorenzo: Ok. Just to give you guys some updates, the lakes are doing well as far as the water maintenance and water management, so as far as the water goes and the midge. So we received one complaint and I think a second one through the HOA regarding the midge, we met onsite in March and he started services, he usually starts in May, and you guys have a 6 month service like we discussed many times in the last few years with regards to the midge, so you have a 6 month service. We already assessed it, we’ve obtained bids for maintenance and also the midge as well and the Board chose not to move forward with it, and the midge has always been from May to September.
Ms. DelRio: And we’re paying a lot for that too.
Mr. Lorenzo: Correct, he’s been giving you guys, he’s given you guys a free service every year, this past December he gave you another service, and he starting now in March, so he started the May service now in March and he’s going to do April as well at no additional cost to the District.
Ms. DelRio: And recently we go quotes for other options on that, and I think he was the cheapest and the one that didn’t want to do more because we had other companies that wanted to charge us to do more, and he’s like there’s no reason for that.
Mr. Lorenzo: And one of them wanted to use less frequently. Ms. DelRio: Exactly and that’s not going to be successful.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, on page 187 you guys will see the chemicals that they’re using and an information sheet and continuing on page 191, those are the two different insecticide and the larvicide that he’s doing.
Ms. DelRio: So quick question, I didn’t see it on the agenda, are we going to talk about the trees on 87th?
Mr. Lorenzo: Yes, I’m going to get to that next but, I just wanted to touch on this because I know it’s been a concern and just to give you guys an update.

Ms. DelRio: Because we need to use that for the HOA as well, whatever is happening on the CDD side.
Mr. Lorenzo: Correct, so as far as, and before I get into 87th, I just want to finish my update. The pool permit, that was the violation you guys received, we’re working on it with Ortiz, they’re looking into the electrical side of things and are trying to work with the company that we used at the time, and this was from 2023 to close the plumbing side. So, we received updates and hopefully by the next meeting we’ll have more information, if within the next few weeks we don’t have this resolved, or see that it’s getting resolved, we have a secondary option and a contractor to proceed with closing these permits. The good news is you guys have 6 months from when we re-opened it which was right now we’re in the first month, so you still have 5 more months to close this and satisfy this permit, so this is the permit that was never closed for the pool heaters, so just to kind of comment on that. Now as far as the tree trimming, the trees that were trimmed on 87th that received the citation back in March, we didn’t have the March meeting, those trees were hat racked, so the District trees that are along 87th on both sides, the entrance side.
Ms. DelRio: Right, so you know we trimmed the trees on 87th like every year we
do.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, you see on page 167 of your agenda package you guys will see
pictures of the trees.
Ms. DelRio: We have 44 trees there.
Mr. Lorenzo: Right, so there’s 44 trees and you guys received two citations, one for 25 trees, and one for 19 trees, so there’s 44 total trees along 87th, they gumbo limbo trees. There’s a $500 fine per tree, the fine total is if I’m not mistaken, $22,000 total.
Mr. Trujillo: What have been cited for?
Mr. Lorenzo: For cutting the trees unlawfully is what they’re citing. Ms. DelRio: Somebody complained.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, it looks like somebody may have complained per our discussion with them, we don’t know for sure but that’s what it sounds like.
Ms. Fernandez: Somebody complained about cutting the trees. Ms. DelRio: Yes.
Mr. Lorenzo: And to my knowledge what they complained about is the branches going into their yards.

Ms. DelRio: And then they called the city I guess, and the city came and decided to fine us. I met with Jesus and Terry, who is our arborist from the District and Jeremy from Parks and Recreational from the Town of Miami Lakes, and we tried because the vendor is taking ownership of this because we just told him in a Board meeting let’s trim the trees like we do every year, and he been doing it like he does every year, and I guess the town got the complaint, and the town didn’t like the way we trimmed them, that’s why we’re getting fined $500 per tree times 44 trees. So, the last think I heard from Jesus yesterday, which I didn’t like that either, because the whole reason that we met with the Director of Parks and Recreation was to mitigate this because my whole thing and I explained this to him, that we never received a letter and tell me if the District has, we have never received a letter telling us, listen you hat racked the trees, you can’t do this again, otherwise you’re going to get fined, so there was no warnings, we never got this before, and he said, oh maybe yes there was something, I believe we have something, and so I told Jesus, check it out because in my life I’ve never seen that here. So, I told him, I wouldn’t have done it.
A resident: And not only that, they have never trimmed them either. Ms. DelRio: No, we have, we’ve trimmed those before.
A resident: No, we have but if the city is complaining that they are their trees. Ms. DelRio: No, those are our trees, they just grow over.
Mr. Trujillo: They’re just saying that they didn’t like the way that we trimmed them.
Ms. DelRio: Yes, the trees are ours, that’s not in question, the town is not supposed to trim our trees, we are, we just need to trim them to their standards which according to them we didn’t. So, I met with them, and Terry was very helpful, and I don’t want to create a precedent, the vendor is in the best position to pay for the fee but, I don’t like that type of position either because it’s not fair, and again, if they gave you warning or let’s call to find out, but now they’re telling us that in May we can get on an agenda.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, we requested a hearing but, also and this is why Terry has been helping us, we met with the Parks director, Jeremy, to discus this and come up with a mitigation. The discussion included a crown restoration mitigation program to help be in compliance to retrain these trees to grow properly because that’s another thing, contingent upon how the District responds. So, we requested a hearing, we’ve been trying to mitigate and trying to work through this together with the Parks director, he responded yesterday and let us know that it’s pretty straight forward regarding the hat racking there’s not much

up for interpretation or remedy, that given his expertise that we have to plead the case with a special magistrate hearing. So, they told us originally that April was full, that we would have to wait until May, so we’re trying to reach out to him through the phone to see what we can do to mitigate this and not go to a hearing if possible, if not, what he’s suggesting is that we go to a hearing.
Ms. Fernandez: So, just to be clear, they never sent anything to us stating that there was any issue, and we don’t have guidelines for what’s approved?
Ms. DelRio: They do have guidelines, the arborist, according to the website, which he hasn’t even shared with us.
Ms. Fernandez: There’s arborist’s standards, and according to that it is a violation, and according to the town the trees were not cut to those standards so they can issue a violation without notice or warning or anything.
Mr. Lorenzo: And Terry are you there? Mr. Glynn: Yes, go ahead.
Mr. Lorenzo: I don’t know if you want to chime in on anything that we just discussed regarding the tree violation.
Mr. Glynn: Surely. So, I tried to see Jeremy and he did pick up the phone yesterday but he was tied up, and that’s when he sent me the email with the response on his end, so he’s suggesting we go and I can be present at the hearing with the magistrate, we can plead our case as far as a crown restoration mitigation and then ask for a reduction in fines for removal of the fines. Sometimes these magistrates if it’s a fist offense there’s no present outstanding other code violations they will reduce the fine, they will agree to a form of mitigation which we supervise, so when we do get that date, I’ll make myself available.
Ms. DelRio: And who’s the magistrate, I’m just concerned, do we have a magistrate in Miami Lakes?
Mr. Glynn: They’re usually a retired judge or maybe an attorney that is appointed to be the person who oversees code enforcements, or jurisdictional stuff.
Ms. DelRio: Ok, I was just interested in knowing what that meant. Mr. Trujillo: Yes, I think it’s important that we’re there.
Ms. DelRio: I don’t know because that would be quorum.

Mr. Trujillo: Well, not us, I’m not necessarily saying us but, I’m just saying someone to representing us ensuring of that and because to me it sounds like bogus thing that needs to be put into place in terms of, we’ve never had an issue with this in the past, we understand this isn’t towards your guidelines and now we are aware and this won’t happen in the future but, for us to be paying a $22,000 fine for that sounds crazy.
Ms. DelRio: Which we’re not, our vendor has taken full responsibility of this but, still I don’t think it’s fair for us to create this precedent.
Mr. Trujillo: The other question that comes with this too is we’ve been cutting down those trees more because of homeowners who are constantly cutting it.
Ms. DelRio: Oh no, nothing is getting cut from now on.
Mr. Trujillo: So, this needs to be advertised to the community in terms of saying these are the regulations put in place by the Town of Miami Lakes, we can no longer do this because this needs to be said going forward to everybody.
Ms. DelRio: Yes and we were just waiting for today because we do have some incidents on the HOA side especially by the count which we got very lucky because the count got trimmed last year because some homeowners are complaining about doing the leaves and you have a clearance of 10’ from those trees to the house, and they’re still complaining about the leaves, and told Maria, there’s no trimming, so after this, because Jeremy is very nice and he said, listen only a 10’ clearance, that’s how much you need to have, so people can go through and that’s it, if there’s a dead branch, or a branch is going into that person’s home, you cut that one branch, if the angle or whatever, it says you’re supposed to go directly down, that’s what we’re cutting. So, from now on that’s all you’re going to see this whole preparation for hurricane season, it’s gone.
Mr. Trujillo: And I think now having said that, now that we have this issue it’s important that the whole community is aware.
Ms. Martino: Can we share the fine that we got with the community?
Ms. DelRio: We’re not going to share the fine but we have an HOA meeting tomorrow and we’ll address it there at that meeting, when Maria is going to be sending a mass email now that we had this meeting we can further discuss and she can share with everybody, and you can also send a mass email about the regulations and the town code for trimming trees, and the clearance, and I can talk to you about it a little more so you can

send like a, did you know, out there and then tomorrow we can address it at the HOA meeting.
Ms. Hernandez: Ok, and then it will be reflected on the weekend.
Mr. Trujillo: Right, and that way it’s on the record that this is something that we tried to appease homeowners but, now we can no longer do that because of such and such.
Ms. Hernandez: Yes.
A resident: (inaudible comment)
Ms. DelRio:	So, we not paying the fine, we’re not, we’re holding our vendor accountable for that.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, we’ve been doing everything possible.
(At this point several people were talking at one time, and no one conversation could be heard)

Mr. Lorenzo: So, let’s continue to figure out this process and we’re working on it, I’m working with Terry and we’ll continue working with Jeremy from the Town of Miami Lakes to see what we can do to mitigate the situation.
Ms. Fernandez: Yes, we have the outcome and the figures, we can also move forward with the next step.
Mr. Lorenzo: Yes, and when there’s a hearing, Terry and I will be there to make sure we present the case, we present the mitigation program and go from there to see if we can get it reduced completely, or some type or reduction. Are there any questions in regards to the field report?
Ms. DelRio: No.

CDD Manager
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving along to the CDD manager, I have nothing else to report on the manager’s side, aside from some of the items that the Board had requested at the last meeting. I know that in regards to the lake erosion, the Board requested the testing results from inception, I’ve reached out to the engineers, pretty much what they’re directing me, they don’t have the information as far as the suitable material used for the lake. I’ve reached out to Lennar and they don’t have the documentation from back then, they said it’s too old but, we’re reaching out to the county to see if we can find other information

regarding the lake and when it was constructed and the reports at that time, so I’m working on that as well.
(At this point several people were talking at one time, and no one conversation could be heard)
Ms. DelRio: So, we need to get Maria involved, with all those pictures I just submitted, Maria I need you go over all those pictures.
Ms. Hernandez: Yes, I think I already have them, we sent violations and that was last month.
Ms. DelRio: And do you have like a glossary or something, what is this? Ms. Hernandez: Is that from my report, or from Jesus’ report?
Ms. DelRio: It’s the whole structure of the lake.
Mr. Lorenzo: It looks like the address of the one that you guys were questioning on page 254.
Mr. Trujillo: That’s been there for a long time though. Mr. Lorenzo: Yes, it’s 9023 154th Terrace.
Ms. Hernandez: Ok.
Ms. DelRio: So, something like this, we need to know if that concrete is encroaching into the property, and then number two they need to put grass there, so I want you to look into all those properties one by one.
Mr. Lorenzo: So, I put comments on some of them, you’ll see it. Ms. DelRio: Yes.
Ms. Hernandez: Ok, so what you want is a list of all the houses and their violations.
(At this point several people were talking at one time, and no one conversation could be heard)
Mr. Lorenzo: Anything that may impact the berm we don’t know if it did or not, and we don’t know how it looked before but, any question of an enhancement has been put into this report.
A resident: (inaudible comment)
Mr. Lorenzo: So, I’ll send you the report. So, unless you have any other questions.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Acceptance of Check Register
Acceptance of Unaudited Financials
Mr. Lorenzo: Moving on item No. 8, financial reports, tab A is the acceptance of the check register on page 258, and tab B is the acceptance of the unaudited financials on page 266. Unless the Board has any questions or concerns a motion to approve would be in place.

On MOTION by Ms. DelRio seconded by Mr. Cubias with all in favor, the Check Register and the Unaudited Financials were approved.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisors Requests
Mr. Lorenzo:	Moving on to Supervisor’s requests, are there any Supervisor’s requests?

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Secretary /Assistant Secretary

Mr. Lorenzo: Not hearing any, a motion to adjourn would be in order.

On MOTION by Ms. DelRio seconded by Mr. Trujillo with all in favor, the Meeting was adjourned.

Chairman / Vice Chairman

Certificate Of Completion

Envelope Id: 124DB491-7819-80D0-8330-97990DA1238A	Status: Completed Subject: Centre Lake: Complete with Docusign: 4-15-26 Minutes.pdf, Resolution 2026-03.docx, Resolution 2026-0
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 54	Signatures: 6	Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 2	Initials: 0	Ellen Acosta

AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)

1001 Bradford Way
Kingston, TN 37763 eacosta@gmssf.com
IP Address: 162.199.192.217

Record Tracking		
Status: Original
6/18/2026 1:31:52 PM	Holder: Ellen Acosta
eacosta@gmssf.com	Location: DocuSign	
Signer Events	Signature	Timestamp	
Janexy DelRio Janexy.delrio@yahoo.com Chair	
	Sent: 6/18/2026 1:47:21 PM Resent: 6/22/2026 8:50:32 AM Resent: 6/29/2026 6:29:15 AM	

Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)	Signature Adoption: Drawn on Device
Using IP Address: 73.27.84.108 Signed using mobile

Resent: 6/30/2026 11:37:21 AM Resent: 7/1/2026 6:18:45 AM Viewed: 7/2/2026 10:37:51 AM Signed: 7/2/2026 10:38:22 AM

Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign

Jesus Lorenzo		Sent: 6/18/2026 1:47:20 PM	
jlorenzo@gmssf.com		Viewed: 6/19/2026 5:21:40 AM	
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None)	

Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style	Signed: 6/19/2026 5:21:57 AM	
	Using IP Address: 134.199.102.221		
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign			
In Person Signer Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Editor Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Agent Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Intermediary Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Certified Delivery Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Carbon Copy Events	Status	Timestamp	
			
Witness Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Notary Events	Signature	Timestamp	
			
Envelope Summary Events	Status	Timestamps	
Envelope Sent	Hashed/Encrypted	6/18/2026 1:47:21 PM	
Certified Delivered	Security Checked	6/19/2026 5:21:40 AM	
Signing Complete	Security Checked	6/19/2026 5:21:57 AM	

Envelope Summary Events	Status	Timestamps	
Completed	Security Checked	7/2/2026 10:38:22 AM	
Payment Events	Status	Timestamps